Research in counseling 

      The objectivity and subjectivity in research may be different in methodologies due to synthesizing and placing people, places, and things into a perspective. The research process relies heavily on objectivity, which may conflict with our personal objectives; however, it doesn’t always equal a great research method. Through objectivity, we can gain knowledge through research and assess the validity of our understanding. When looking at subjectivity, it may take on a series of standpoints that differ from standard methodologies (oclc.org). While viewing the video, it really stood out that the best way to understand objectivity and subjectivity is to dive into a research project. The panelist did mention that the best way to learn research methods is to complete a research project.

     Evidence-Based Practice has been measured with the results of individualized studies that rely on statistical testing to gauge its usefulness in helping the profession. Programs that are state or federally funded require programs to utilize EBP with trained facilitators (Chambless et al., 1998). The strengths of EBP can be related to running the program with fidelity. When counselors don’t adhere to EBP, they run the risk of being out of compliance with funding and state review agencies. As a counselor, I like process therapy groups, which allow for more personal counseling styles. Oftentimes by using different modalities, we can reach clients on a more personal level.

References

Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 66(1), 7.

Sage Research Methods - Objectivity and Subjectivity in Social Research (oclc.org)